linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: mt6380: Fix unused array warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220727140809.0951b72d@endymion.delvare>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:08:09 +0200
From:   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Chenglin Xu <chenglin.xu@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: mt6380: Fix unused array warning

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:01:29 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> > This assumes that the mt6380 driver can be used without OF support.
> > However, I can't find any in-tree piece of code instantiating the
> > "mt6380-regulator" platform device by name. So unless there's an
> > out-of-tree user, a better fix would be to remove mt6380_platform_ids
> > and make the driver depend on OF. Chenglin, would that be OK with
> > you?  
> 
> It's helpful to keep the build coverage high.

OF does not depend on the architecture, anyone can enable it. So I
can't see any problem of coverage with making drivers depend on OF.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support