[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220727124126.222137-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:41:26 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] perf kwork: Fix spelling mistake "Captuer" -> "Capture"
There is a spelling mistake in a pr_debug message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
index fb8c63656ad8..d5906e939756 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void sig_handler(int sig)
* Simply capture termination signal so that
* the program can continue after pause returns
*/
- pr_debug("Captuer signal %d\n", sig);
+ pr_debug("Capture signal %d\n", sig);
}
static int perf_kwork__report_bpf(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists