[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4aab976-d930-612c-38cb-b6f413f3654e@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:57:03 +0800
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf kwork: Fix spelling mistake "Captuer" ->
"Capture"
Hello Colin,
On 2022/7/27 20:41, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in a pr_debug message. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
> index fb8c63656ad8..d5906e939756 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
> @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void sig_handler(int sig)
> * Simply capture termination signal so that
> * the program can continue after pause returns
> */
> - pr_debug("Captuer signal %d\n", sig);
> + pr_debug("Capture signal %d\n", sig);
> }
>
> static int perf_kwork__report_bpf(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
>
OK, I'll fix in next patch,thanks for your review.
Regards,
Jihong
.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists