[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <870d507d-a516-5601-4d21-2bfd571cf008@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 23:52:05 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/25] KVM: VMX: nVMX: Support TSC scaling and
PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL with enlightened VMCS
On 7/25/22 20:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> I kind of like the idea of having a two-dimensional array based on the enums
>> instead of switch statements, so for now I'll keep Vitaly's enums.
> I don't have a strong opinion on using a 2d array, but unless I'm missing something,
> that's nowhere to be found in this patch. IMO, having the enums without them
> providing any unique value is silly and obfuscates the code.
Yeah, like this:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index d8da4026c93d..8055128d8638 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -342,9 +342,10 @@ uint16_t nested_get_evmcs_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return 0;
}
-enum evmcs_v1_revision {
+enum evmcs_revision {
EVMCSv1_2016,
EVMCSv1_2022,
+ EVMCS_REVISION_MAX,
};
enum evmcs_unsupported_ctrl_type {
@@ -353,13 +354,37 @@ enum evmcs_unsupported_ctrl_type {
EVMCS_2NDEXEC,
EVMCS_PINCTRL,
EVMCS_VMFUNC,
+ EVMCS_CTRL_MAX,
+};
+
+static u32 evmcs_unsupported_ctls[EVMCS_CTRL_MAX][EVMCS_REVISION_MAX] = {
+ [EVMCS_EXIT_CTLS] = {
+ [EVMCSv1_2016] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL | VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
+ [EVMCSv1_2022] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL,
+ },
+ [EVMCS_ENTRY_CTLS] = {
+ [EVMCSv1_2016] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL | VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
+ [EVMCSv1_2022] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL,
+ },
+ [EVMCS_2NDEXEC] = {
+ [EVMCSv1_2016] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC | SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING,
+ [EVMCSv1_2022] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC,
+ },
+ [EVMCS_PINCTRL] = {
+ [EVMCSv1_2016] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL,
+ [EVMCSv1_2022] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL,
+ },
+ [EVMCS_VMFUNC] = {
+ [EVMCSv1_2016] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC,
+ [EVMCSv1_2022] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC,
+ },
};
static u32 evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
enum evmcs_unsupported_ctrl_type ctrl_type)
{
struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu);
- enum evmcs_v1_revision evmcs_rev = EVMCSv1_2016;
+ enum evmcs_revision evmcs_rev = EVMCSv1_2016;
if (!hv_vcpu)
return 0;
@@ -367,32 +392,7 @@ static u32 evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (hv_vcpu->cpuid_cache.nested_ebx & HV_X64_NESTED_EVMCS1_2022_UPDATE)
evmcs_rev = EVMCSv1_2022;
- switch (ctrl_type) {
- case EVMCS_EXIT_CTLS:
- if (evmcs_rev == EVMCSv1_2016)
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL |
- VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
- else
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
- case EVMCS_ENTRY_CTLS:
- if (evmcs_rev == EVMCSv1_2016)
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL |
- VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
- else
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
- case EVMCS_2NDEXEC:
- if (evmcs_rev == EVMCSv1_2016)
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC |
- SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING;
- else
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
- case EVMCS_PINCTRL:
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
- case EVMCS_VMFUNC:
- return EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return evmcs_unsupported_ctls[ctrl_type][evmcs_rev];
}
void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists