[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fac4319d-26ee-1702-518c-2d6fbb1a0d57@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:21:05 +0800
From: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] LoongArch: Add section of GOT for kernel module
On 07/28/2022 05:02 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 16:29 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>> On 07/28/2022 12:26 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>>> + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_type = SHT_NOBITS;
>>> + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_flags = SHF_ALLOC;
>>> + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_addralign = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
>>> + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_size = (num_plts + 1) *
>>> sizeof(struct plt_entry);
>>> + mod->arch.got.num_entries = 0;
>>> + mod->arch.got.max_entries = num_plts;
>> Hi, Ruoyao
>>
>> We should use num_gots instead of num_plts when creating .got
>> section.
>
> Yes, it's a stupid error and I'll fix it in V2.
>
> But why didn't this cause a malfunction on my system? :(.
Maybe num_plts is greater than num_gots, and the size of plt_entry is
equivalent to the size of four got_entry, so that when the module is
loaded, it just allocates a larger space without causing the module to
fail to load.
Thanks,
Youling
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists