[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39d3b56e3265e70d26e1d08698b461d81c3e1c1d.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:53:24 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] LoongArch: Add section of GOT for kernel module
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 17:21 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/28/2022 05:02 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 16:29 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> > > On 07/28/2022 12:26 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_type = SHT_NOBITS;
> > > > + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_flags = SHF_ALLOC;
> > > > + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_addralign = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
> > > > + mod->arch.got.shdr->sh_size = (num_plts + 1) *
> > > > sizeof(struct plt_entry);
> > > > + mod->arch.got.num_entries = 0;
> > > > + mod->arch.got.max_entries = num_plts;
> > > Hi, Ruoyao
> > >
> > > We should use num_gots instead of num_plts when creating .got
> > > section.
> >
> > Yes, it's a stupid error and I'll fix it in V2.
> >
> > But why didn't this cause a malfunction on my system? :(.
>
> Maybe num_plts is greater than num_gots, and the size of plt_entry is
> equivalent to the size of four got_entry, so that when the module is
> loaded, it just allocates a larger space without causing the module to
> fail to load.
I'll write a module to load address of 10 kernel symbols with only one
printk call to test before sending V2 :).
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists