lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:30:04 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        liqiong@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/aperfmperf: use time_is_before_jiffies(a + b) to
 replace "jiffies - a > b"

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:55:51AM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
> 在 2022年07月28日 00:00, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:14:05AM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
> > > time_is_before_jiffies deals with timer wrapping correctly.
> > Please explain how the current code does not.
> 
> 1. If the timer wrap changes in the future you won't have to alter your code.
> 
> 2. unsigned long ut;
> 
>    ut = ULONG_MAX + 4;
> 
>    printf("time_after(ut, ULONG_MAX), ut:%d, %d --> %d\n", ut,
>              time_after(ut, ULONG_MAX), (ULONG_MAX - ut) < 0);
> 
> 
>    In this case, time_after returns true, it's correct.

Now try the same with the existing code...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ