[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ecd4dcc3-321c-e228-96a3-bac08c56794a@nfschina.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:55:51 +0800
From: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
liqiong@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/aperfmperf: use time_is_before_jiffies(a + b) to
replace "jiffies - a > b"
在 2022年07月28日 00:00, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:14:05AM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
>> time_is_before_jiffies deals with timer wrapping correctly.
> Please explain how the current code does not.
1. If the timer wrap changes in the future you won't have to alter your code.
2. unsigned long ut;
ut = ULONG_MAX + 4;
printf("time_after(ut, ULONG_MAX), ut:%d, %d --> %d\n", ut,
time_after(ut, ULONG_MAX), (ULONG_MAX - ut) < 0);
In this case, time_after returns true, it's correct.
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
>> index 1f60a2b27936..22e0bac3fffe 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
>> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>> * Bail on invalid count and when the last update was too long ago,
>> * which covers idle and NOHZ full CPUs.
>> */
>> - if (!mcnt || (jiffies - last) > MAX_SAMPLE_AGE)
>> + if (!mcnt || time_is_before_jiffies(last + MAX_SAMPLE_AGE))
>> goto fallback;
>>
>> return div64_u64((cpu_khz * acnt), mcnt);
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists