lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <882a28de-3bd5-23e5-fbad-bfdc2a4a24e4@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:57:44 +0800
From:   "chenxiaosong (A)" <chenxiaosong2@...wei.com>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <guoxuenan@...wei.com>, <liuyongqiang13@...wei.com>,
        <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix NULL pointer dereference in xfs_getbmap()

在 2022/7/27 23:16, Darrick J. Wong 写道:

> Heh.  Is this worth an fstest?  It probably is, since prior to 5.20 this
> would have been a UAF bug on top of a NULL deref.

I will try to add regression test to xfstests for this commit when it is 
merged into mainline.

> 
> Nit: it's ILOCK, not i_lock.  Otherwise... this looks correct to me --
> take the IOLOCK and ILOCK in shared mode before accessing the inode fork
> structures.
> 
> Do you have any suggestions for Fixes:?  I suspect this has been broken
> for quite some time.

The "Fixes:" label is: abbf9e8a4507 ("xfs: rewrite getbmap using the 
xfs_iext_* helpers")

> 
> No need to fix the nit, I'll do that when I commit this.
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> 
> --D
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ