[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73f83b51eaf40ff1f173059e1f187182db47a1c6.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:57:10 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] LoongArch: Support relocation against
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 17:14 +0800, Jinyang He wrote:
> Not sure but maybe re-align is needed here.
> Since '{BYTE(0)}' actually use 1byte. _GLOABL_OFFSET_TABLE_ may have
> difference with really GOT table entry. Have no machine and without
> test... :-(
BYTE(0) is only for preventing the linker from removing the section.
All we want from the linker is a slot for .got in the section table, and
the actual property (including size) will be filled at runtime by
module_frob_arch_sections. The first GOT entry won't be "appended"
after one byte, it is wrote into the start of .got (at runtime).
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists