linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 4/7] KVM: SVM: Report NMI not allowed when Guest busy handling VNMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Jul 2022 14:41:20 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     "Shukla, Santosh" <santosh.shukla@....com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/7] KVM: SVM: Report NMI not allowed when Guest busy
 handling VNMI

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, Shukla, Santosh wrote:
> Hello Sean,
> 
> On 7/21/2022 3:24 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2022, Santosh Shukla wrote:

...

> >> @@ -3609,6 +3612,9 @@ static void svm_enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> >>  
> >> +	if (is_vnmi_enabled(svm))
> >> +		return;
> > 
> > Ugh, is there really no way to trigger an exit when NMIs become unmasked?  Because
> > if there isn't, this is broken for KVM.
> > 
> 
> Yes. there is.
> 
> NMI_INTERCEPT will trigger VMEXIT when second NMI arrives while guest is busy handling first NMI.

But NMI_INTERCEPT only applies to "real" NMIs.  The scenario laid out below is where
KVM wants to inject a virtual NMI without an associated hardware/real NMI, e.g. if
multiple vCPUs send NMI IPIs to the target.

> And in that scenario, Guest will exit with V_NMI_MASK set to 1, KVM can inject pending(Second)
> NMI(V_NMI=1). Guest will resume handling the first NMI, then HW will
> clear the V_NMI_MASK and later HW will take the pending V_NMI in side the guest. 
> 
> I'll handle above case in v3.
> 
> Thanks,
> Santosh
> 
> > On bare metal, if two NMIs arrive "simultaneously", so long as NMIs aren't blocked,
> > the first NMI will be delivered and the second will be pended, i.e. software will
> > see both NMIs.  And if that doesn't hold true, the window for a true collision is
> > really, really tiny.
> > 
> > But in KVM, because a vCPU may not be run a long duration, that window becomes
> > very large.  To not drop NMIs and more faithfully emulate hardware, KVM allows two
> > NMIs to be _pending_.  And when that happens, KVM needs to trigger an exit when
> > NMIs become unmasked _after_ the first NMI is injected.
> > 
> >> +
> >>  	if ((vcpu->arch.hflags & (HF_NMI_MASK | HF_IRET_MASK)) == HF_NMI_MASK)
> >>  		return; /* IRET will cause a vm exit */
> >>  
> >> -- 
> >> 2.25.1
> >>