linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1809cefc-0c59-ef6c-c3da-7695722a8b78@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 10:21:08 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        avri.altman@....com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, sc.suh@...sung.com, hy50.seo@...sung.com,
        sh425.lee@...sung.com, bhoon95.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt

On 7/31/22 20:09, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> Link lost is treated as fatal error with the following
> patch, but its event isn't registered as interrupt source,
> so I enable it.
> --
> scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error

Is this patch perhaps intended as a fix for patch "scsi: ufs: Treat link 
loss as fatal error"? If so, does it need a Fixes: tag?

Thanks,

Bart.