linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00dd01d8a610$a2136fe0$e63a4fa0$@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:38:57 +0900
From:   "Kiwoong Kim" <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>
To:     "'Bart Van Assche'" <bvanassche@....org>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <beanhuo@...ron.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        <sc.suh@...sung.com>, <hy50.seo@...sung.com>,
        <sh425.lee@...sung.com>, <bhoon95.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: enable link lost interrupt

> > Link lost is treated as fatal error with the following patch, but its
> > event isn't registered as interrupt source, so I enable it.
> > --
> > scsi: ufs: Treat link loss as fatal error
> 
> Is this patch perhaps intended as a fix for patch "scsi: ufs: Treat link
> loss as fatal error"? If so, does it need a Fixes: tag?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

Right and let me add the tag.

Thanks.
Kiwoong Kim