linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Improve MCP3911 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YueEg0tmKpc4kdLO@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:45:07 +0200
From:   Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kent Gustavsson <kent@...oris.se>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Improve MCP3911 driver

On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:07:17 +0200
> Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This patch series intend to fix bugs and improve functionality of the
> > MCP3911 driver.
> > The main features added are
> > - Support for buffers
> > - Interrupt driven readings
> > - Support for oversampling ratio
> > - Support for set scale values (Gain)
> > 
> > Among the bug fixes, there are changes in the formula for calculate raw
> > value and a fix for mismatch in the devicetree property.
> > 
> > Another general improvement for the driver is to use managed resources
> > for all allocated resources.
> > 
> Hi Marcus,
> 
> The first 3 fixes look good to me.  Do you want me to pick those up to
> go in after rc1 via my togreg-fixes branch?  The side effect of doing
> that is it'll be a little while before they are upstream in the branch
> I'll want to pick the rest of the series on top of.
> 
> So it's a trade off between getting fixes in as soon as possible and
> slowing down other improvements a little.

Both ways works for me.
I guess it is preferable to get the fixes in as soon as possible?

If so, do you want me to rebase the series on your togreg-fixes branch
or wait to send v5 until the patches are upstream?

Or simply keep sending the whole series?

Thanks,
Marcus Folkesson

> 
> Jonathan
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)