linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully re-evaluate MMIO caching when SPTE masks change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72b51c373e09fe8f0a6a65c40d75753348c64ce1.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:42:55 +1200
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully re-evaluate MMIO caching when
 SPTE masks change

On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 23:05 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 21:15 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2022, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > > But we are not checking any of those in kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(), right? :)
> > > 
> > > No, but we really should.
> > 
> > I can come up a patch if you are not planning to do so?
> 
> Hmm, I'll throw one together, it's simple enough (famous last words) and it'll
> need to be tested on AMD as well.

Sure.

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai