[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710f2b46-f30a-3d69-4a2c-2c67cb62c80b@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:09:08 -0700
From: Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] Coresight: Add support for TPDM and TPDA
Hi Suzuki,
On 8/2/2022 10:43 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Trilok,
>
> On 02/08/2022 18:33, Trilok Soni wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote:
>>> Hi Reviewers,
>>>
>>> Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>> Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the
>> acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review
>> these patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and
>> had a good amount of reviews and revisions :)
>
> This series has been reviewed for the previous versions (which is why
> we have it in v12) and this one depends on a series worked on by Mike
> Leach. We cannot push this without the dynamic Trace ID allocation
> scheme, which is clearly mentioned in the cover letter for this
> series.
>
> As such this series is in a good shape, assuming all the comments
> in the previous version has been addressed. So, we would rather
> get Mike's work priority and pull that in, so that we can eventually
> get this upstream.
>
>
I believe we have addressed all the comments in v12. Are you ok, if we
post additional features series (around ~2k to ~3k SLOC)? I just want to
make sure we are not creating flood of patches w/ features.
---Trilok Soni
Powered by blists - more mailing lists