[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d7519f7-0cc6-c9ff-f9e6-f29cb264d66a@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 10:05:00 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] Coresight: Add support for TPDM and TPDA
On 02/08/2022 19:09, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> On 8/2/2022 10:43 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Hi Trilok,
>>
>> On 02/08/2022 18:33, Trilok Soni wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/2/2022 7:43 AM, Jinlong Mao wrote:
>>>> Hi Reviewers,
>>>>
>>>> Please help to review V12 series of TPDM/TPDA patches.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>
>>> Suzuki and Mathieu, we are almost there it seems in getting the
>>> acceptance of these patches, so I hope you find the time to review
>>> these patches. I guess it is almost a year now for these patches and
>>> had a good amount of reviews and revisions :)
>>
>> This series has been reviewed for the previous versions (which is why
>> we have it in v12) and this one depends on a series worked on by Mike
>> Leach. We cannot push this without the dynamic Trace ID allocation
>> scheme, which is clearly mentioned in the cover letter for this
>> series.
>>
>> As such this series is in a good shape, assuming all the comments
>> in the previous version has been addressed. So, we would rather
>> get Mike's work priority and pull that in, so that we can eventually
>> get this upstream.
>>
>>
>
> I believe we have addressed all the comments in v12. Are you ok, if we
> post additional features series (around ~2k to ~3k SLOC)? I just want to
> make sure we are not creating flood of patches w/ features.
You are free to post the patches, as long as you clearly mention the
dependencies in the cover letter. Please be mindful about the merge window.
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists