[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13d16a59-0b13-8484-380c-21deb864f0f2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:16:02 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de
Cc: eranian@...gle.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/resctrl: Support for AMD QoS new features
and bug fix
On 8/2/22 03:55, Babu Moger wrote:
> v2:
> a. Rebased the patches to latest stable tree (v5.18.15). Resolved some conflicts.
> b. Added the patch to fix CBM issue on AMD. This was originally discussed
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220517001234.3137157-1-eranian@google.com/
>
Shouldn't this series be rebased on tip tree? I think it's odd to base
new feature series on stable tree, since patches on the latter are mostly
bugfixes backported from mainline.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists