linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/resctrl: Support for AMD QoS new features and bug fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yujw0FOMj3tS0f3k@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:39:28 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        reinette.chatre@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, eranian@...gle.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/resctrl: Support for AMD QoS new features
 and bug fix


* Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:

> On 8/2/22 03:55, Babu Moger wrote:
> > v2:
> >   a. Rebased the patches to latest stable tree (v5.18.15). Resolved some conflicts.
> >   b. Added the patch to fix CBM issue on AMD. This was originally discussed
> >      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220517001234.3137157-1-eranian@google.com/
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't this series be rebased on tip tree? I think it's odd to base 
> new feature series on stable tree, since patches on the latter are mostly 
> bugfixes backported from mainline.

Normally that's true, but AFAICS the patchset applies cleanly to latest 
-tip as well, so 'stable == tip' in this regard.

Series looks good to me (without having tested it):

  Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo