lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:00:49 +0530
From:   Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To:     "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] thermal: qcom: tsens: Add driver
 support for re-initialization quirk

Hi,

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 13:01, Chen, Rong A <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> On 7/26/2022 7:38 PM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 7/26/22 4:40 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> Hi Bhupesh,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >>
> >> [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/thermal]
> >> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.19-rc8 next-20220725]
> >> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> >> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> >> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >>
> >> url:
> >> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bhupesh-Sharma/Add-support-for-tsens-controller-reinit-via-trustzone/20220724-202546
> >>
> >> base:
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git
> >> thermal
> >> config: ia64-randconfig-r005-20220724
> >> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220726/202207260755.tUajnfB4-lkp@intel.com/config)
> >>
> >> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> >>          wget
> >> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
> >> -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >>          #
> >> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/2356630fadc0a622264bf292b6930f8c728b0709
> >>
> >>          git remote add linux-review
> >> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> >>          git fetch --no-tags linux-review
> >> Bhupesh-Sharma/Add-support-for-tsens-controller-reinit-via-trustzone/20220724-202546
> >>
> >>          git checkout 2356630fadc0a622264bf292b6930f8c728b0709
> >>          # save the config file
> >>          mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> >>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0
> >> make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash
> >>
> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >>
> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >>
> >>     ia64-linux-ld: drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.o: in function
> >> `tsens_probe':
> >>>> tsens.c:(.text+0x6d2): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_is_available'
> >>     ia64-linux-ld: drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.o: in function
> >> `tsens_health_check_and_reinit.constprop.0':
> >>>> tsens.c:(.text+0x10c2): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_tsens_reinit'
> >
> > It seems you have missed picking up [PATCH 1/5] firmware: qcom: scm: Add
> > support for tsens reinit workaround before running the checks on this
> > patch which is a part of this series itself (see [1]).
>
> Hi Bhupesh,
>
> Thanks for the feedback, the bot applied the full patch set to test,
> please see
>
>
> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bhupesh-Sharma/Add-support-for-tsens-controller-reinit-via-trustzone/20220724-202546
>
>
> Maybe the bot chose a wrong base branch to apply which caused the
> unexpected issue.

Sure, no problem. Thanks for your email.

Regards,
Bhupesh

> > If I pick the PATCHes in the right order [PATCH 1/5], [PATCH 2/5]
> > followed by [PATCH 3/5], I don't see the compilation error being
> > reported (even with W=1 build options).
> >
> > [1].
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220724122424.2509021-2-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org/
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bhupesh
> > _______________________________________________
> > kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ