[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH=2NtztrMyPzvF9-9jsCnuM=40TmzXUvLBu_O5r_zRRtRwSiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:02:44 +0530
From: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] thermal: qcom: tsens: Add reinit quirk support for
sm6375 controller
Hi Konrad,
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 19:42, Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24.07.2022 14:24, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > tsens controller(s) on Qualcomm sm6375 SoC might start in
> > an unknown state or start with TSENS_EN indicating
> > a 'disabled' state when they enter linux world.
> >
> > In such cases, it is useful to try and reinit them via
> > trustzone [via scm call(s)], at the very start.
> >
> > Add hooks for the same in the qcom tsens driver.
> >
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>
> > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
> > ---
> This sadly doesn't work.. the issue on 6375 is that the controller
> is in some weird state at boot and this bit that's higher up:
>
> ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[TSENS_EN], &enabled);
> if (ret)
> goto err_put_device;
> if (!enabled) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: device not enabled\n", __func__);
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto err_put_device;
> }
>
> does not succeed.
>
> Moving the code added in the patch up or calling
> qcom_scm_tsens_reinit() or qcom_scm_tsens_reinit() and
> tsens_reenable_hw_after_scm(priv) directly before this enable
> check also fails. In fact, the latter crashes the platform..
>
> I don't want to block this series, so I suggest the 6375 part can
> be dropped for now.
Many thanks for testing the patchset. I agree.. let me drop this patch
from the v3 version and we can later target this sm6375 issue via a
separate patch.
Regards,
Bhupesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists