linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] ufs: core: ufshcd: use local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e98d1448-ca35-b29a-0960-e3cb8a9673a0@acm.org>
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 10:41:35 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>,
        Stanley Chu <chu.stanley@...il.com>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ufs: core: ufshcd: use local_clock() for debugging
 timestamps

On 8/2/22 17:07, Daniil Lunev wrote:
>> Please kindly add all Reviewed or Acked tags received in previous
>> versions to any newer patches.
>
> Oh, thanks for this suggestion, I didn't know if I should do that. Should
> I create a new patch with those brought over?

That sounds like a good idea to me. Otherwise this information will be 
lost when the SCSI maintainer queues this patch.

Thanks,

Bart.