[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YusDmF39ykDmfSkF@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 00:24:08 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git pile 3 - dcache
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:09:23 -0700
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Admittedly I think "preempt_enable_under_spinlock()" may be a bit
> > *too* cumbersome as a name. It does explain what is going on - and
> > both the implementation and the use end up being fairly clear (and the
> > non-RT case could have some debug version that actually tests that
> > preemption has already been disabled).
>
> preempt_disable_inlock() ?
preempt_disable_locked()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists