[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220804075152.kqlp5weoz4grzbpp@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:51:52 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Würl <sebastian.wuerl@...ratech.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Stefan Mätje <stefan.maetje@....eu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Christian Pellegrin <chripell@...e.org>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: mcp251x: Fix race condition on receive interrupt
On 04.08.2022 09:45:07, Sebastian Würl wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 9:06 AM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Another optimization idea: Do we need to re-read the eflag1? "eflag" is
> > for error handling only and you're optimizing the good path.
>
> I'd argue if a new message entered mailbox 1, this also potentially
> changed the error state, so we need to read it.
Makes sense!
> Thanks a lot for your feedback! Will post v3 soon.
>
> Also I'm sorry for spam in anyones inbox, I didn't get my mailing
> program to produce plain-text for the last mail.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists