[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f7db66e-c486-4687-bd8e-75478df06a28@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 11:24:57 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Megha Dey <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>,
"Oliver Sang" <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 09/65] x86/fpu: Sanitize xstateregs_set()
On 8/5/2022 5:12 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> gVisor test passes with this change too. Chang, are you going to send a patch?
Oh, sounds good then.
Will post patches. But I guess I need to revise them a bit.
Thanks,
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists