[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1660cdf4-96c1-b6bb-a3be-d02c7a3affb9@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 11:35:14 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Megha Dey <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>,
Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 09/65] x86/fpu: Sanitize xstateregs_set()
On 8/5/22 11:24, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> On 8/5/2022 5:12 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>> gVisor test passes with this change too. Chang, are you going to send
>> a patch?
>
> Oh, sounds good then.
>
> Will post patches. But I guess I need to revise them a bit.
I've also got a series that Andy, Thomas and I were poking at last week.
I'll try and get it out the door today.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists