[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=3j2NM2kS8iw14G6MnGirb0=O6XQyCsY9vVgsZ1DfLaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 13:22:52 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@...ro.com>
Cc: ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, ark.email@...il.com,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, bobo1239@....de, bonifaido@...il.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, davidgow@...gle.com, dev@...lasmohrin.de,
dsosnowski@...snowski.pl, foxhlchen@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
geofft@...reload.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jarkko@...nel.org, john.m.baublitz@...il.com,
leseulartichaut@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m.falkowski@...sung.com,
me@...enk.de, milan@...verde.com, mjmouse9999@...il.com,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
thesven73@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viktor@...ar.de, wedsonaf@...gle.com,
Andreas Hindborg <andreas.hindborg@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/27] rust: add `kernel` crate
On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 12:25 PM Konstantin Shelekhin
<k.shelekhin@...ro.com> wrote:
>
> I sense possible problems here. It's common for a kernel code to pass
> flags during memory allocations.
Yes, of course. We will support this, but how exactly it will look
like, to what extent upstream Rust's `alloc` could support our use
cases, etc. has been on discussion for a long time.
For instance, see https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/815 for
a potential extension trait approach with no allocator carried on the
type that Andreas wrote after a discussion in the last informal call:
let a = Box::try_new_atomic(101)?;
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists