linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 12/27] rust: add `kernel` crate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yu5bUK4/70SanMss@yadro.com>
Date:   Sat, 6 Aug 2022 15:15:12 +0300
From:   Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@...ro.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
CC:     <ojeda@...nel.org>, <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <ark.email@...il.com>,
        <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <bobo1239@....de>,
        <bonifaido@...il.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        <davidgow@...gle.com>, <dev@...lasmohrin.de>,
        <dsosnowski@...snowski.pl>, <foxhlchen@...il.com>,
        <gary@...yguo.net>, <geofft@...reload.com>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        <john.m.baublitz@...il.com>, <leseulartichaut@...il.com>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <m.falkowski@...sung.com>, <me@...enk.de>, <milan@...verde.com>,
        <mjmouse9999@...il.com>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <thesven73@...il.com>,
        <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <viktor@...ar.de>,
        <wedsonaf@...gle.com>, Andreas Hindborg <andreas.hindborg@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/27] rust: add `kernel` crate

On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 01:22:52PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > I sense possible problems here. It's common for a kernel code to pass
> > flags during memory allocations.
> 
> Yes, of course. We will support this, but how exactly it will look
> like, to what extent upstream Rust's `alloc` could support our use
> cases, etc. has been on discussion for a long time.
> 
> For instance, see https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/815 for
> a potential extension trait approach with no allocator carried on the
> type that Andreas wrote after a discussion in the last informal call:
> 
>     let a = Box::try_new_atomic(101)?;

IMO it's just easier to always pass flags like this:

  let a = Box::try_new(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA, 101)?;

But if allocate_with_flags() will be somehow present in the API that's
just what we need.

P.S. Thanks for a quick reply!