[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc0dbf3d-d524-7edc-6fbf-0067c75c3d03@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 08:21:56 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: drivers/md/raid10.c:2647:60: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in
argument 5 (different base types)
On 8/5/22 21:44, kernel test robot wrote:
> drivers/md/raid10.c:1139:30: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@ expected int const op @@ got restricted blk_opf_t enum req_op @@
> drivers/md/raid10.c:1139:30: sparse: expected int const op
> drivers/md/raid10.c:1139:30: sparse: got restricted blk_opf_t enum req_op
> drivers/md/raid10.c:1140:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long const do_sync @@ got restricted blk_opf_t @@
> drivers/md/raid10.c:1140:52: sparse: expected unsigned long const do_sync
> drivers/md/raid10.c:1140:52: sparse: got restricted blk_opf_t
I can't reproduce this with Linus' master branch. It seems like the
kernel test robot picked a commit somewhere halfway my patch series?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists