linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i7aqURUA3AOpssKCjucPpyys5-KKWgrujxNwxkg_x-+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:31:30 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:03 PM Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 8/2/22 21:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > In order to make the underneath API easier to change in the future,
> > prevent users from dereferencing fwnode from struct device.
> > Instead, use the specific dev_fwnode() and device_match_fwnode()
> > APIs for that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>

Applied, thanks!

> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/viot.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/viot.c b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> > index 647f11cf165d..6132092dab2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >       }
> >
> > -     fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
> > +     fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
> >       if (!fwnode) {
> >               /*
> >                * PCI devices aren't necessarily described by ACPI. Create a
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
> >               }
> >               set_primary_fwnode(&pdev->dev, fwnode);
> >       }
> > -     viommu->fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
> > +     viommu->fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
> >       pci_dev_put(pdev);
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int viot_dev_iommu_init(struct device *dev, struct viot_iommu *viommu,
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >
> >       /* We're not translating ourself */
> > -     if (viommu->fwnode == dev->fwnode)
> > +     if (device_match_fwnode(dev, viommu->fwnode))
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> >       ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(viommu->fwnode);
>