linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f2685007-0331-aaea-bfbe-074a3680fc29@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:03:08 +0200
From:   Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: VIOT: Do not dereference fwnode in struct
 device

Hi Andy,

On 8/2/22 21:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In order to make the underneath API easier to change in the future,
> prevent users from dereferencing fwnode from struct device.
> Instead, use the specific dev_fwnode() and device_match_fwnode()
> APIs for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/viot.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/viot.c b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> index 647f11cf165d..6132092dab2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/viot.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
> +	fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
>  	if (!fwnode) {
>  		/*
>  		 * PCI devices aren't necessarily described by ACPI. Create a
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int __init viot_get_pci_iommu_fwnode(struct viot_iommu *viommu,
>  		}
>  		set_primary_fwnode(&pdev->dev, fwnode);
>  	}
> -	viommu->fwnode = pdev->dev.fwnode;
> +	viommu->fwnode = dev_fwnode(&pdev->dev);
>  	pci_dev_put(pdev);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static int viot_dev_iommu_init(struct device *dev, struct viot_iommu *viommu,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	/* We're not translating ourself */
> -	if (viommu->fwnode == dev->fwnode)
> +	if (device_match_fwnode(dev, viommu->fwnode))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(viommu->fwnode);