linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh1q7ZSWhDWOyqmVawqjq55sUVkn8ASjE_b2VOcE1vFaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:30:28 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL_COW

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 1:20 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> IIUC VM_MAYSHARE is always set in a MAP_SHARED mapping, but for file
> mappings we only set VM_SHARED if the file allows for writes

Heh.

This is a horrific hack, and probably should go away.

Yeah, we have that

                        if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
                                vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE | VM_SHARED);

but I think that's _entirely_ historical.

Long long ago, in a galaxy far away, we didn't handle shared mmap()
very well. In fact, we used to not handle it at all.

But nntpd would use write() to update the spool file, adn them read it
through a shared mmap.

And since our mmap() *was* coherent with people doing write() system
calls, but didn't handle actual dirty shared mmap, what Linux used to
do was to just say "Oh, you want a read-only shared file mmap? I can
do that - I'll just downgrade it to a read-only _private_ mapping, and
it actually ends up with the same semantics".

And here we are, 30 years later, and it still does that, but it leaves
the VM_MAYSHARE flag so that /proc/<pid>/maps can show that it's a
shared mapping.

                 Linus