lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 22:42:06 +0200 From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL_COW On 09.08.22 22:30, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 1:20 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote: >> >> IIUC VM_MAYSHARE is always set in a MAP_SHARED mapping, but for file >> mappings we only set VM_SHARED if the file allows for writes > > Heh. > > This is a horrific hack, and probably should go away. > > Yeah, we have that > > if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) > vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE | VM_SHARED); > > > but I think that's _entirely_ historical. > > Long long ago, in a galaxy far away, we didn't handle shared mmap() > very well. In fact, we used to not handle it at all. > > But nntpd would use write() to update the spool file, adn them read it > through a shared mmap. > > And since our mmap() *was* coherent with people doing write() system > calls, but didn't handle actual dirty shared mmap, what Linux used to > do was to just say "Oh, you want a read-only shared file mmap? I can > do that - I'll just downgrade it to a read-only _private_ mapping, and > it actually ends up with the same semantics". > > And here we are, 30 years later, and it still does that, but it leaves > the VM_MAYSHARE flag so that /proc/<pid>/maps can show that it's a > shared mapping. I was suspecting that this code is full of legacy :) What would make sense to me is to just have VM_SHARED and make it correspond to MAP_SHARED, that would at least confuse me less. Once I have some spare cycles I'll see how easy that might be to achieve. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists