lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ef26db5-6e2b-ce27-f9ad-34ff8f4055cb@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:45:46 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Kästle <peter@...e.net>, rafael@...nel.org
Cc:     rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        "open list:ACER ASPIRE ONE TEMPERATURE AND FAN DRIVER" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 23/26] thermal/drivers/acerhdf: Use generic
 thermal_zone_get_trip() function

On 08/08/2022 21:34, Peter Kästle wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> some comments.  Please merge if those are considered.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> On 05.08.22 16:57, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The thermal framework gives the possibility to register the trip
>> points with the thermal zone. When that is done, no get_trip_* ops are
>> needed and they can be removed.
>>
>> Convert ops content logic into generic trip points and register them 
>> with the
>> thermal zone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Kästle <peter@...e.net>

Thanks for reviewing the patch

[ ... ]

>>       if (kernelmode && prev_interval != interval) {
>>           if (interval > ACERHDF_MAX_INTERVAL) {
>>               pr_err("interval too high, set to %d\n",
> 
> I don't know the current behavior of the thermal layer well enough.
> Is it ensured, that those new trips[0].temperature / trips[0].hysteresis 
> values are taken into account?

I don't have this platform so it is hard to test. All the device tree 
based sensors are using now those generic trip points and that works.



-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ