[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf912249-a91e-77a5-0cc7-de5f85c6a6cd@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:53:48 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, ast@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] bpf: Allow kfuncs to be used in LSM programs
On 8/9/22 3:45 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
>
> In preparation for the addition of bpf_getxattr kfunc.
Given this is taken out of context and the series is not about bpf_getxattr,
this patch should have a better commit description.
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Please also append your SoB then [0].
[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
> ---
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index d3e4c86b8fcd..67dfc728fbf8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -7244,6 +7244,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_type_to_kfunc_hook(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
> return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_STRUCT_OPS;
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
> return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_TRACING;
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL:
> return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_SYSCALL;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists