linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] btf: Handle dynamic pointer parameter in kfuncs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8fe84489-be78-142e-90fe-a76c7d61100d@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:08:53 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
        yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        corbet@....net, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
        jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] btf: Handle dynamic pointer parameter in kfuncs

On 8/9/22 3:45 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Allow the bpf_dynptr_kern parameter to be specified in kfuncs. Also, ensure
> that the dynamic pointer is valid and initialized.
> 
> Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  3 +++
>   kernel/bpf/btf.c             | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c        |  4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index 2e3bad8640dc..55876fbdbae2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -560,6 +560,9 @@ int check_kfunc_mem_size_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state
>   			     u32 regno);
>   int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
>   		   u32 regno, u32 mem_size);
> +bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +			      struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
> +			      enum bpf_arg_type arg_type);
>   
>   /* this lives here instead of in bpf.h because it needs to dereference tgt_prog */
>   static inline u64 bpf_trampoline_compute_key(const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 67dfc728fbf8..17cca396c89f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -6363,6 +6363,8 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>   
>   			if (is_kfunc) {
>   				bool arg_mem_size = i + 1 < nargs && is_kfunc_arg_mem_size(btf, &args[i + 1], &regs[regno + 1]);
> +				bool arg_dynptr = btf_type_is_struct(ref_t) &&
> +						  !strcmp(ref_tname, "bpf_dynptr_kern");

For the strcmp(), could we add some BUILD_BUG_ON() if "bpf_dynptr_kern" ever
gets renamed? I played a bit with the below compile-tested toy example. If we
rename foo_bar into something else, we then get:

   [...]
   CC      net/core/dev.o
   In file included from <command-line>:
   net/core/dev.c: In function ‘net_dev_init’:
   net/core/dev.c:11376:25: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘struct foo_bar’
   11376 |  ({ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct x) < 0); \
         |                         ^~~~~~
   [...]

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 716df64fcfa5..a2ed271f7ded 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -11368,16 +11368,30 @@ static struct pernet_operations __net_initdata default_device_ops = {
   *
   */

+struct foo_bar {
+       int a;
+};
+
+#define stringify_struct(x)                    \
+       ({ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct x) < 0);  \
+       __stringify(x); })
+
  /*
   *       This is called single threaded during boot, so no need
   *       to take the rtnl semaphore.
   */
  static int __init net_dev_init(void)
  {
+       const char *ref_tname = "abc";
         int i, rc = -ENOMEM;

         BUG_ON(!dev_boot_phase);

+       printk("%s\n", stringify_struct(foo_bar));
+
+       if (!strcmp(ref_tname, stringify_struct(foo_bar)))
+               goto out;
+
         if (dev_proc_init())
                 goto out;