lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:29:28 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
        yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        corbet@....net, dhowells@...hat.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
        jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] btf: Handle dynamic pointer parameter in kfuncs

On 8/9/22 3:45 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 67dfc728fbf8..17cca396c89f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -6363,6 +6363,8 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>   
>   			if (is_kfunc) {
>   				bool arg_mem_size = i + 1 < nargs && is_kfunc_arg_mem_size(btf, &args[i + 1], &regs[regno + 1]);
> +				bool arg_dynptr = btf_type_is_struct(ref_t) &&
> +						  !strcmp(ref_tname, "bpf_dynptr_kern");
>   
>   				/* Permit pointer to mem, but only when argument
>   				 * type is pointer to scalar, or struct composed
> @@ -6372,6 +6374,7 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>   				 */
>   				if (!btf_type_is_scalar(ref_t) &&
>   				    !__btf_type_is_scalar_struct(log, btf, ref_t, 0) &&
> +				    !arg_dynptr &&
>   				    (arg_mem_size ? !btf_type_is_void(ref_t) : 1)) {
>   					bpf_log(log,
>   						"arg#%d pointer type %s %s must point to %sscalar, or struct with scalar\n",
> @@ -6379,6 +6382,20 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>   					return -EINVAL;
>   				}
>   
> +				/* Assume initialized dynptr. */

This comment is a bit misleading, too, given we don't assume but enforce it. I'd probably
just fold this into above one where we permit pointer to mem given the test there gets
extended anyway, so the comment should be in line with the tests.

> +				if (arg_dynptr) {
> +					if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg,
> +							ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)) {
> +						bpf_log(log,
> +							"arg#%d pointer type %s %s must be initialized\n",
> +							i, btf_type_str(ref_t),
> +							ref_tname);
> +						return -EINVAL;
> +					}
> +
> +					continue;
> +				}
> +
>   				/* Check for mem, len pair */
>   				if (arg_mem_size) {
>   					if (check_kfunc_mem_size_reg(env, &regs[regno + 1], regno + 1)) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ