[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOUHufbGcuvJ8EfBkWrdCgeMCiceP0SxHZzcJnOt1Mw0P2w9kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:35:44 -0600
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: "Alex Zhu (Kernel)" <alexlzhu@...com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...com>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ning Zhang <ningzhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: add thp_utilization metrics to /proc/thp_utilization
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 11:16 AM Alex Zhu (Kernel) <alexlzhu@...com> wrote:
>
>
> > OK, it is hard to tell what it looks like now. But the THPs on the
> > deferred split list may be on the "low utilization split" list too?
> > IIUC the major difference is to replace zero-filled subpage to special
> > zero page, so you implemented another THP split function to handle it?
> >
> > Anyway the code should answer the most questions.
>
> They can indeed end up on both lists. This did have to be handled when
> implementing the shrinker.
>
> We free the zero filled subpages, while modifying the existing split_huge_page()
> function. Will follow up that change in another patch.
FYI. This series does it:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210731063938.1391602-1-yuzhao@google.com/
And this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1635422215-99394-1-git-send-email-ningzhang@linux.alibaba.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists