[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220809131516.xfezk7kuyu3eelsb@cab-wsm-0029881.sigma.sbrf.ru>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:15:15 +0000
From: Aleksey Romanov <AVRomanov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
CC: Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ngupta@...are.org" <ngupta@...are.org>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@...e.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19]
Hi Sergey,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:53:36PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > If you make the decision to revert slow path removal patch, I would
> > prefer to review the original patch with unneeded code removal again
> > if you don't mind:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220422115959.3313-1-avromanov@sberdevices.ru/
>
> Sure, we can return to it after the merge window.
In that case, do I need to send my original patch again?
--
Thank you,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists