linux-kernel - Re: ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 22:29:05 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     Aleksey Romanov <AVRomanov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Rokosov <DDRokosov@...rdevices.ru>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ngupta@...are.org" <ngupta@...are.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19]

On (22/08/09 13:15), Aleksey Romanov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:53:36PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > If you make the decision to revert slow path removal patch, I would
> > > prefer to review the original patch with unneeded code removal again
> > > if you don't mind:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220422115959.3313-1-avromanov@sberdevices.ru/
> > 
> > Sure, we can return to it after the merge window.
> 
> In that case, do I need to send my original patch again? 

Would be nice, since the patch needs rebasing (due to zsmalloc PTR_ERR changes)