linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers:gpu:drm:amd:amdgpu:amdgpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7cf898fd-f3fe-061d-19ec-68d74627bd7d@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 15:28:08 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Wentao_Liang <Wentao_Liang_g@....com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
        Xinhui.Pan@....com
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:gpu:drm:amd:amdgpu:amdgpu_cs.c:fix a potential
 use-after-free

Am 28.07.22 um 14:12 schrieb Wentao_Liang:
> in line 1535, "dma_fence_put(fence);" drop the reference to fence and may
> cause fence to be released. However, fence is used subsequently in line
> 1542 "fence->error". This may result in an use-after-free bug.
>
> It can be fixed by recording fence->error in a variable before dropping
> the reference to fence and referencing it after dropping.
>
> The bug has been confirmed by Christian König on 2021-08-16. Now, I
> resend this patch with my real name. I hope the patch can be updated
> in a near future.

The subject line should be something like "drm/amdgpu: fix potential use 
after free".

>
> Signed-off-by: Wentao_Liang <Wentao_Liang_g@....com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index b28af04b0c3e..1d675a5838f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> @@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_wait_all_fences(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>   				     struct drm_amdgpu_fence *fences)
>   {
>   	uint32_t fence_count = wait->in.fence_count;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	unsigned int i, error;

>   	long r = 1;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < fence_count; i++) {
> @@ -1533,14 +1533,15 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_wait_all_fences(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>   
>   		r = dma_fence_wait_timeout(fence, true, timeout);
>   		dma_fence_put(fence);
> +		error = fence->error;

That's still the wrong order, you need to get the fence error before 
dropping the reference.

Christian.

>   		if (r < 0)
>   			return r;
>   
>   		if (r == 0)
>   			break;
>   
> -		if (fence->error)
> -			return fence->error;
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;
>   	}
>   
>   	memset(wait, 0, sizeof(*wait));