lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:41:18 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>, magalilemes00@...il.com,
        tales.aparecida@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/format-helper: Add KUnit tests for drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb565()

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 10:01 AM José Expósito
<jose.exposito89@...il.com> wrote:
>
> José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com> wrote:
> > I already fixed the warning and added the reviewed by tags, however, I
> > noticed that rebasing the series on the latest drm-misc-next show this
> > error:
> > [...]
>
> Sorry for the extra email. I forgot to mention that the error is only
> present in UML. Running in other architectures works as expected.
> Tested on x86_64 and PowerPC.

Can you take a look at the raw output?

It would be .kunit/test.log (or replace .kunit with w/e --build_dir
you're using).
You could also run the test with --raw_output to have kunit.py print
that out instead.
We might want to compare the output on UML vs x86 and see what looks suspicious.

These errors
  [ERROR] Test: xrgb8888_to_rgb332_test: missing subtest result line!
means that kunit.py can't parse the KTAP output.

It could be that the output is mangled for some reason.
I recall running into a UML-specific issue with output mangling on an
old kernel fork. I doubt it's related to this one, but it shows that
it's possible there could be something going on.

-Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ