lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <343d1491-49a0-ea38-1b65-dc2bdfb4726d@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 09:08:14 -0700
From:   Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        <james.morse@....com>, <rric@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix crash when using Qcom LLCC/EDAC drivers

Hello Mani,

On 8/11/2022 4:57 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Clipped the bouncing email addresses...
> 
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:23:34PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 04:50:32PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>>> I know get_maintainer.pl :) But the problem is, Qualcomm recently
>>>> switched their email domain from codeaurora.org to quicinc.com.
>>>
>>> Great:
>>>
>>> $ git grep codeaurora.org MAINTAINERS | wc -l
>>> 5
>>>
>>
>> Yep! Most of the active developers have already changed their domains in
>> MAINTAINERS file. But the left ones are either not actively maintained
>> (yeah bad) or the maintainers have left Qualcomm.
>>
>>> ;-\
>>>
>>>> So even if I use the maintainers codeaurora domain now, they will
>>>> bounce.
>>>
>>> Hmm, so the mails I sent with codeaurora on Cc didn't bounce back - I
>>> got only the quicinc bounces. That doesn't mean that codeaurora actually
>>> gets delivered...
>>>
>>
>> Not sure why. It was supposed to bounce. But could be that Qualcomm IT
>> decided to not bounce anymore since they have got enough complaints from
>> developers ;)
>>
> 
> Okay, seems to be bouncing for me:
> 
> The response from the remote server was:
> 585 5.1.1 <ckadabi@...eaurora.org>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: No such user here.
> 585 5.1.1 <vnkgutta@...eaurora.org>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: No such user here.

It is ok if someone from Linaro team becomes the maintainer for this 
driver.

---Trilok Soni

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ