linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix crash when using Qcom LLCC/EDAC drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:27:11 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix crash when using Qcom LLCC/EDAC drivers

Clipped the bouncing email addresses...

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:23:34PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 04:50:32PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > I know get_maintainer.pl :) But the problem is, Qualcomm recently
> > > switched their email domain from codeaurora.org to quicinc.com.
> > 
> > Great:
> > 
> > $ git grep codeaurora.org MAINTAINERS | wc -l
> > 5
> > 
> 
> Yep! Most of the active developers have already changed their domains in
> MAINTAINERS file. But the left ones are either not actively maintained
> (yeah bad) or the maintainers have left Qualcomm.
> 
> > ;-\
> > 
> > > So even if I use the maintainers codeaurora domain now, they will
> > > bounce.
> > 
> > Hmm, so the mails I sent with codeaurora on Cc didn't bounce back - I
> > got only the quicinc bounces. That doesn't mean that codeaurora actually
> > gets delivered...
> > 
> 
> Not sure why. It was supposed to bounce. But could be that Qualcomm IT
> decided to not bounce anymore since they have got enough complaints from
> developers ;)
> 

Okay, seems to be bouncing for me:

The response from the remote server was:
585 5.1.1 <ckadabi@...eaurora.org>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: No such user here.
585 5.1.1 <vnkgutta@...eaurora.org>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: No such user here.

Thanks,
Mani

> > > For that reason, I used their quicinc domain addresses. But since they
> > > are bouncing, it looks like the maintainers left Qualcomm :/
> > 
> > Hmm, is there some way to get in touch with those folks?
> > 
> 
> I don't think so. I checked in the internal Qualcomm database and
> confirmed that I couldn't find the maintainers names there.
> 
> > Or whoever is taking over those drivers?
> > 
> 
> LLCC is maintained by Bjorn (CCed) since it falls under soc/qcom. But I'm
> not sure about EDAC. I think we should mark it as not maintainted until we
> find a volunteer.
> 
> Bjorn, thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> > Thx.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Regards/Gruss,
> >     Boris.
> > 
> > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette