linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix crash when using Qcom LLCC/EDAC drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220811115334.GC29799@workstation>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:23:34 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ckadabi@...cinc.com,
        vnkgutta@...cinc.com, mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
        rric@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Channagoud Kadabi <ckadabi@...eaurora.org>,
        Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta <vnkgutta@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix crash when using Qcom LLCC/EDAC drivers

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 04:50:32PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > I know get_maintainer.pl :) But the problem is, Qualcomm recently
> > switched their email domain from codeaurora.org to quicinc.com.
> 
> Great:
> 
> $ git grep codeaurora.org MAINTAINERS | wc -l
> 5
> 

Yep! Most of the active developers have already changed their domains in
MAINTAINERS file. But the left ones are either not actively maintained
(yeah bad) or the maintainers have left Qualcomm.

> ;-\
> 
> > So even if I use the maintainers codeaurora domain now, they will
> > bounce.
> 
> Hmm, so the mails I sent with codeaurora on Cc didn't bounce back - I
> got only the quicinc bounces. That doesn't mean that codeaurora actually
> gets delivered...
> 

Not sure why. It was supposed to bounce. But could be that Qualcomm IT
decided to not bounce anymore since they have got enough complaints from
developers ;)

> > For that reason, I used their quicinc domain addresses. But since they
> > are bouncing, it looks like the maintainers left Qualcomm :/
> 
> Hmm, is there some way to get in touch with those folks?
> 

I don't think so. I checked in the internal Qualcomm database and
confirmed that I couldn't find the maintainers names there.

> Or whoever is taking over those drivers?
> 

LLCC is maintained by Bjorn (CCed) since it falls under soc/qcom. But I'm
not sure about EDAC. I think we should mark it as not maintainted until we
find a volunteer.

Bjorn, thoughts?

Thanks,
Mani

> Thx.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette