linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Fix typo in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gRUmMu7zGgH3F32C8DB6RsOqnNPw+L8023A89Tiqy-qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:25:08 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>
Cc:     Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: Fix typo in comments

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 5:53 PM Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com> wrote:
>
> Delete the repeated word "method" in comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@...rlc.com>

Please note that the ACPICA changes need to be submitted to the
upstream ACPICA project on github.  If your change is applicable to
that code base, please consider submitting a pull request for it on
github.

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/psparse.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psparse.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psparse.c
> index ba93f359760a..b0faab1e6d3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psparse.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psparse.c
> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_ps_parse_aml(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state)
>                         }
>
>                         /*
> -                        * If the transfer to the new method method call worked,
> +                        * If the transfer to the new method call worked,
>                          * a new walk state was created -- get it
>                          */
>                         walk_state = acpi_ds_get_current_walk_state(thread);
> --
> 2.35.1
>