[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220811155632.1536867-14-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:55:23 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, daniel@...earbox.net,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 14/69] libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
[ Upstream commit b58b2b3a31228bd9aaed9b96e9452dafd0d46024 ]
Currently, the 64bit relocation value in the instruction
is computed as follows:
__u64 imm = insn[0].imm + ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32)
Suppose insn[0].imm = -1 (0xffffffff) and insn[1].imm = 1.
With the above computation, insn[0].imm will first sign-extend
to 64bit -1 (0xffffffffFFFFFFFF) and then add 0x1FFFFFFFF,
producing incorrect value 0xFFFFFFFF. The correct value
should be 0x1FFFFFFFF.
Changing insn[0].imm to __u32 first will prevent 64bit sign
extension and fix the issue. Merging high and low 32bit values
also changed from '+' to '|' to be consistent with other
similar occurences in kernel and libbpf.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607062610.3717378-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c b/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
index 4016ed492d0c..1d65b47c0779 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static int bpf_core_patch_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return -EINVAL;
}
- imm = insn[0].imm + ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32);
+ imm = (__u32)insn[0].imm | ((__u64)insn[1].imm << 32);
if (res->validate && imm != orig_val) {
pr_warn("prog '%s': relo #%d: unexpected insn #%d (LDIMM64) value: got %llu, exp %u -> %u\n",
prog_name, relo_idx,
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists