[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9dc3a83-faec-71e0-c48e-25e16e18dc29@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:00:39 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <mail@...chuod.ie>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix missing
clocks properties
On 12/08/2022 10:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/08/2022 23:33, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Upgrading dt-schema to v2022.08 reveals unevaluatedProperties issues
>> that were not previously visible, such as the missing clocks and
>> clock-names properties for PolarFire SoC's PCI controller:
I don't think this part of sentence is worth staying in Git. The schema
is released so obviously everyone should upgrade. In two years will it
matter which version brought unevaluatedProperties to a enforced state?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists