linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix missing clocks properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <059e4394-df66-abee-2c11-7f8e9dafc577@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:09:49 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <mail@...chuod.ie>,
        <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        <palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix missing
 clocks properties

On 12/08/2022 09:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 12/08/2022 10:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/08/2022 23:33, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>>
>>> Upgrading dt-schema to v2022.08 reveals unevaluatedProperties issues
>>> that were not previously visible, such as the missing clocks and
>>> clock-names properties for PolarFire SoC's PCI controller:
> 
> I don't think this part of sentence is worth staying in Git. The schema
> is released so obviously everyone should upgrade. In two years will it
> matter which version brought unevaluatedProperties to a enforced state?

I have no strong feelings :)
I'll put it under the --- in the next version as I think it has value
for people reading the patches since it's fairly likely they won't see
the errors.