linux-kernel - Re: [ata] 0568e61225: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fd2b1dbe-8482-cb89-2568-4909db1239b0@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 18:17:39 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
CC:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <lkp@...ts.01.org>, <lkp@...el.com>,
        <ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>, <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ata] 0568e61225: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec -15.0%
 regression

On 12/08/2022 16:41, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> we noticed the commit is already in mainline now, and in our tests, there is
>>> still similar regression and also on other platforms.
>>> could you guide us how to check "which host driver is being used for this
>>> test"? hope to supply some useful information.
>>>
>> For me, a complete kernel log may help.
> I had a look yesterday with my test rig. I did not see any difference in the
> default max_sectors_kb values for various drives between 5.18 and 5.19 (current
> linus tree). The test machine has 2 AHCI adapters: Intel and Marvell. Both use
> the regular AHCI driver. I have another rig with different ATA adapters but it
> is powered down and I am traveling... So cannot test that right now.
> 

FWIW, on QEMU I get a difference for IDE disk for ata_piix host.

Interestingly ata dev max_sectors kb also gets capped from 32MB (LBA48) 
-> 256KB due to swiotlb max mapping size. (It would be capped by shost 
default max sectors 512KB without that swiotlb limit). I assume capping 
due to swiotlb limit is not occuring on Oliver's machine.

thanks,
John

[    1.497233] ata7: found unknown device (class 0)
[    1.498341] ata7.00: ATA-7: QEMU HARDDISK, 2.5+, max UDMA/100
[    1.499030] ata7.00: 209716 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
[    1.623795] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.624633] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.633395] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.634200] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.635094] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.635887] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    1.636748] scsi 6:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      QEMU HARDDISK 
  2.5+ PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    1.641298] sd 6:0:0:0: [sda] 209716 512-byte logical blocks: (107 
MB/102 MiB)
[    1.642188] sd 6:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[    1.642770] sd 6:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[    1.642783] sd 6:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: 
enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[    1.644149] sd 6:0:0:0: [sda] Preferred minimum I/O size 512 bytes
[    1.645142] sd 6:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
[    1.655145] sd 6:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk